Wednesday, March 13, 2013

The Four Asian Tigers



This cartoon clearly shows the positive effects of a globalized economy through the example of the Four Asian Tigers: Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and South Korea. These nations were highly impoverished up until the late 60s. They are represented during this time by flea-bitten, malnourished kittens. However, in the 70s, they began to export goods and, with the money saved by low labor costs, were able to purchase machinery to further speed up production. These goods were exported all over the world, and the four kittens grew into strong tigers with great economic power. Today these countries are among the most highly developed worldwide. If not for globalization and exports, they would likely have remained impoverished.

The Negative Effects of Globalization on the Environment

The message of this cartoon is that globalization is bad for the planet due to its negative effects on the environment. The world is split into thirds. The first third is completely covered in smoke from a plane transporting goods and people. The second third consists of a landfill in North America containing Walmart shopping bags and McDonald's food wrappers, and in Africa, many tree stumps left behind from deforestation with two signs proclaiming "Future Site of McDonald's" and "Future Site of Walmart" imply the the trees were cut down to make room for them. The last third shows the continents surrounded by heavily polluted water. This water pollution was caused by a oil leak coming from a ship that is also transporting goods and people.

Globalization: The "Made in China" Phenomenon And Its Worldwide Benefits

Globalization “represents the growing integration of economies and societies around the world,” or, as Merriam-Webster puts it, “the development of an increasingly integrated global economy marked especially by free trade, free flow of capital, and the tapping of cheaper foreign labor markets.” By promoting economic growth, reducing poverty, and encouraging global cooperation, globalization positively impacts the economies and enriches lifestyles in both the host and outsourcing countries.

Globalization reduces poverty chiefly by providing jobs for citizens of impoverished countries – and, in many cases, export companies pay higher wages than other jobs. Higher competition for workers further increases wages. Globalization also promotes better nutrition, education, and health care, thereby improving the quality of living of those living and working in a host country. Overall, the number of people living in extreme poverty has declined since 1981, and the Four Asian Tigers are a perfect example of this phenomenon. In the 60s, Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South Korea were ranked as “least developed countries, or LDCs (a current example of an LDC is Haiti). Through export industries, tariffs, and investments, these countries have flourished into some of the most developed countries worldwide, experiencing remarkable economic growth. Their GDP growth, for example, rose 7-10 percent. They also began earning high scores on the Human Development Index, and today all rank in the category of “very high development,” earning estimates between 0.886 and 0.898 in 2011.

Globalization and outsourcing also promote economic growth in host countries. They train workers in new technologies and business methods, causing a direct increase in human capital. The Bangladeshi clothing factory workers who went on to become successful clothiers themselves are a classic example of this. Globalization introduces capital, skills, and technologies which would otherwise be absent from these economies. Oftentimes, GDP growth in LDCs is more than two times that of more developed countries. A recent example of high GDP growth is Qatar, which experienced tremendous growth in the 2000’s. Qatar made more significant progress than, say, the United States during this period, so it makes sense that their GDP growth should be more pronounced.

Image showing GDP growth for selected countries in 2009, 2010, and 2011 http://www.contrarian-investor.com/frontier-markets.html

Globalization has in many instances encouraged global cooperation by forging connections between needy and influential individuals, nations, and causes. For example, globalization paved the way for global leaders to meet in 1987 to discuss the thinning of the ozone layer. Globalization created a connection between them that may not otherwise have been present, and the convention was a success. In another case, whales brought to the brink of extinction by commercial whaling techniques. A commission was established, and, after coming under fire for allowing these practices to continue, it established an international band on the commercial hunting of whales. This example of cooperation is particularly touching because it involves a global movement to protect a defenseless species, and that movement’s ultimate success.

Participants in the International Whaling Commission http://iwc.int/members.htm

Globalization, through its promotion of economic growth, emphasis on global cooperation, and tendency to reduce poverty and enrich lifestyles, clearly has a positive impact on economies worldwide. Some argue that globalization erodes cultures, encourages materialism, and has negative environmental impacts. However, the benefits to our “global culture” far outweigh these paltry concerns.

Is Globalization Good Or Bad For Our Planet?


   Globalization is a complex and controversial process. It is driving to your local Walmart and buying products made in China. It is going on vacation to some faraway place and eating a Big Mac for dinner. It is getting a Swedish massage, listening to British music, and reading translated novels from around the world. But it is also losing jobs to outsourcing. It is people in other countries becoming too Americanized to appreciate their own nations traditions. It is pollution caused by planes and ships and trucks transporting goods across the globe. Globalization is everything good and bad about the communication of ideas, information, and capitol around the world. It is an important process, one that effects most people more than they generally we live. Without globalization, so many of the things we typically take for granted would not be in our lives.
   Globalization affects the economic developments of all countries, both rich and poor. In rich countries, the effects are mainly seen as positive, while in poorer countries they are mostly negative. For example, when it comes to exporting goods, more well developed countries have much lower tariffs on goods that are similar or even the same as goods with much higher tariffs made in less developed countries. The negative effects of globalization are also evident when you look at the income gap between those the thing in countries like the United States and Australia and those living in countries like Afghanistan and Nepal. In the past few decades that gap has widened quickly and significantly, showing what many people claim to be proof that free-trade, instead of helping poor nations, is actually hurting. On the other hand, during one period of accelerated globalization between 1990 and 2005, many of the same LCDs, or least developed countries, had a very healthy growth in their GDP, or gross domestic profit. Along with this, global trade helps raise the HDI, or human development index, scores for countries. Finally, research has shown that the number of people living in extreme poverty around the world has been declining since 1981, despite the one billion plus humans that have been added to the world since then. As you can see, with so many different costs and benefits, it is difficult to decide whether the affects of globalization on economic development are truly good or bad.
   The environment is also majorly affected. Pollution, climate change, and the endangerment of wild species are issues that can all be linked to globalization. In terms of pollution, the amount of fuel needed to transport goods from one country to another is massive. In addition, the more globalization occurs, the more people in poorer countries can afford cars, which increases the carbon emissions put into the atmosphere. These emissions, plus those of every new factory built, add together to raise the overall temperature of the planet. This is what is commonly known as global warming. The problems don't and there, though. Humans aren't the only ones facing the negative effects of globalization on the environment. With every chopped down tree and piece of litter and polluted body of water, thousands of plants and animals are losing their habitats and, consequently, their abilities to survive. It seems people will do anything to get more money, even if it means sacrificing another species. Similar to economic development, though, there is a flipside to globalization and the environment. Historically, people do more to protect their environment as they grow richer. Places like London and Lake Erie were far more polluted decades ago then they are today. Globalization also has the possible environmental benefit of fostering international cooperation to solve problems, as evidenced in 1987 when the world leaders met to sign the Montréal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. So can we say that globalization's affect on the environment is entirely good or bad? No, I don't believe we can.
   Other critics of globalization focus on its negative influences on local cultures and traditions. Specifically, the Americanization of other countries. Never before in history has there been a time when American goods and services, such as TV shows, magazines, and movies, have been more accessible in other nations. 50 years ago, the amount of European box office revenue earned by U.S. movies was 35 percent. Recent studies have shown it now ranges between 80 and 90 percent. Smaller countries are affected as well. It is becoming more and more normal in villages for people to wear jeans and a T-shirt instead of traditional clothing, to eat hamburgers and pizza over traditional food, and, especially in the case of teens, to show more interest in TV programs and popular music from abroad then in their countries own folklore and music. Critics also claim that globalization is the reason for many lesser-known and used languages to be dying out. They say that the English language and cultural influences of the Western world have begun to smother them from existence. It has been predicted by language experts that, by the end of the century, more than half of the world 7000 languages will become extinct, taking with them a large wealth of knowledge. Some people though, preferred to overlook these things and instead focus on the positives. They shine a better light on globalization by saying it enriches local cultures by exposing people to new traditions, technology, and ways of doing things. They claim that while cultures share ideas and customs, they still retain their distinct identities. They also point out that due to the easier transportation of goods, developing countries gain larger markets in more developed countries. This in turn positively affects the more developed countries by providing a larger variety of goods. Also, as developing countries become more Americanized, they begin to emulate more American ideals, such as respect for human rights and freedom. Overall, the positive and negative effects of globalization on the cultures and traditions of countries seem to be just about equal.
   The fact that globalization is a significant factor in our lives cannot be denied. Every time you shop at Walmart, or eat at McDonald's, or associate with other MNCs, you are participating in globalization. It plays a large role in our everyday lives, and we frequently forget that. Now though, we must look at the facts and think to ourselves: is globalization helping or hurting our planet? Should we let it continue or should we put a stop to it? Is it all good or all bad, or is it partially both? I don't have the answers to these questions, but I do know one thing for sure. You are the only ones who can tell yourselves what to think, and that is what you have to do now.

Fiscal Interest V.S. Human Needs Cartoon

This cartoon is a representation of how money  takes greater precedence  over the need of a nations people and other national interests. The cartoon shows America and china having a tug of war over a dollar bill. The dollar bill represents the money that is made by trade in-between the nations. And the tug-of- war represents the economic rivalry between the nations and the struggle between the nations to get as much profit from their trade as possible. The people at the feet of the nation’s symbolize the people who are effected by trade between the nations. The people are on the Chinese side are upset because the need for inexpensive labor to make foreign goods compromises their rights as workers. The people on the American side are upset because their jobs have been outsourced to China because the cost of labor is much less then in America. The tension between the nations causes many negative economic, cultural, and social effects such as Americanization in China. In conclusion, this cartoon shows the economic and social struggles between China and America because of globalization. 

Fiscal Interest V.S. Human Needs Cartoon

This cartoon is a representation of how money  takes greater precedence  over the need of a nations people and other national interests. The cartoon shows America and china having a tug of war over a dollar bill. The dollar bill represents the money that is made by trade in-between the nations. And the tug-of- war represents the economic rivalry between the nations and the struggle between the nations to get as much profit from their trade as possible. The people at the feet of the nation’s symbolize the people who are effected by trade between the nations. The people are on the Chinese side are upset because the need for inexpensive labor to make foreign goods compromises their rights as workers. The people on the American side are upset because their jobs have been outsourced to China because the cost of labor is much less then in America. The tension between the nations causes many negative economic, cultural, and social effects such as Americanization in China. In conclusion, this cartoon shows the economic and social struggles between China and America because of globalization. 

Globlization is bad for the first world and the enviroment


                 Globlization is negitivly affecting the world we live in. Globalization is the spread of ideas, information, and capitol across the world. Communicating with others around the world has also become much much easier. If business executive in Japan wanted to have a video conference with a manufacturing plant in Mozambique, it’s just a few clicks away. Globalization can be identified by such practices as outscoring, trade, and sharing of culture. Globalization can have benefits like increased communication among nations and global efforts to increase peace and prosperity. However, its effects are for the most part negative. While the vast exportation of international goods to the U.S. causes prices for most items to go down, its drawbacks far exceed its benefits.

Globalization causes job loss for workers in the United States and other first world countries. This is because the cost of labor in in third world countries is much lower the cost of labor in first world countries. In the U.S. the federially aproved minnimum wage is $7.25 dollars per hour. However, the average cost or labor in foreign countries (specifically China) is 50 to 80 cents per hour. The manufacturing business in the United States has been hit the hardest by the rise of foreign labor. For example, plants that make electronics have had to go out of business because they can’t compete with the low cost of international labor. In the mind of big companies, paying American workers $6 more than what a Chinese worker would earn for doing the same job does not make any economic or fiscal sense. 

Additionally, globalization causes a great strain on the environment. As the population of the world increases the need for living space and farms to grow food for the population also rises. This is a problem because often vital areas like rainforests and wetlands and cleared and populated by those in need of living and farming space. As a result of these areas being populated, many species of wildlife and plants have lost their homes and have gone extinct. Air pollution is also another threat to the environment caused by globalization. As the need for more industry rises the need for more factories to produce goods also rises. These factories burn fossil fuels and emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere which traps the suns rays. This causes a greenhouse effect and the earth’s temperature rises as a result. Since 1975 the average global temperature has rose .5 degrees Celsius and is predicted to rise even more in the future thanks to the carbon emissions from factories and cars.  

Furthermore, the mandates for free trade around the world have forced laws that protect public health and the environment to take a back seat. The World Trade Organization is the leading culprit of this practice. The Word Trade Organization or WTO is an organization that coordinates global trade.  An example of their disregard for protective health laws  would be the European Union’ ban on hormone treated beef from the United States. At first the Union had banned the export because it was deemed a health risk. However, when the U.S. appealed the ban to the World Trade Organization and the E.U. was forced to lift their band despite the imports being a health risk. Even worse was when the U.S. put a ban on shrimp caught in Asian using nets that are not safe for sea turtles. When Asiatic countries whose economies depend on exporting shrimp appealed the ban to the World Trade Organization, and they were forced to repeal the law. This caused the population of Sea Turtles in Asia to fall.

In conclusion, globalization causes, labor problems, job loss, environmental damage, and hurts protective laws worldwide.


This chart shows what forgin goods were expported to the U.S.A. in the year 2007. This is important because it shows how reliante we are becoming on other countries to do our work.